James Thornberg v. L.D. Jones et al
| James E Thornberg |
| Does, L. D. Jones and S. Webster |
| 2:2017cv02676 |
| April 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (See Order for details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)
|
|
Filing
77
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. By December 21, 2018, Plaintiff will file a sworn notice with the Court indicating his current, accurate mailing address. (See Minute Order for further details) re: Mail Returned 76 (vm)
|
|
Filing
74
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without leave to amend against Defendants Jones and Webster, and dismissed with leave to amend against Defendant Miller. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 73 (vm)
|
|
Filing
62
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff must file a notice with the Court by May 8 updating (or deleting) his phone number. (See Minute Order for further details) re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant D Miller PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(B)(6) 61 (vm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
