Ghodooshim and Son, Inc. v. Zhanyou, Inc. et al
| Ghodooshim and Son, Inc. |
| Does, Windsor Fashions, Inc. and Zhanyou, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv02683 |
| April 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| George H. Wu |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 55 : The parties having so stipulated and agreed, the above-referenced case ishereby dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to any party. Each party bear their costs and attorney fees. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
|
|
Filing
54
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu: A Mediation Report advising the Court the matter settled was filed on October 24, 2017. The Court sets an Order to Show re: Settlement Hearing for December 14, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. T he parties are advised that the order to show cause will be vacated and no appearance will be required provided that a Stipulation to Dismiss, with a proposed order, is filed by noon on December 13, 2017. All previously set deadlines and dates are vacated and taken off-calendar. (cr)
|
|
Filing
36
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 35 . (sp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
