Rodney Liddell v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Rodney Liddell v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Rodney Liddell
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	2:2017cv02703
Filed:	April 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge:	Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 4, 2018	Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 5,000.00 and $400.00 in costs. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees. 24 (sbou)
May 18, 2018	Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED that (1) Plaintiff's req uest for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered remanding the matter for further administrative action consistent with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed concurrently herewith. (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 4, 2018

Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 5,000.00 and $400.00 in costs. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees. 24 (sbou)

May 18, 2018

Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED that (1) Plaintiff's req uest for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered remanding the matter for further administrative action consistent with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed concurrently herewith. (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodney Liddell v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Liddell
Represented By:	James P Shea
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?