Martha Elva Yanez v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| Martha Elva Yanez |
| County of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles Sheriff s Department |
| 2:2017cv02741 |
| April 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| George H. Wu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 64 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 ; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND STATE LAW CLAIMS 12 before Judge George H. Wu: Court and counsel confer. The Tentative circulated and a ttached hereto, is adopted as the Courts Final Ruling. The Court would DENY Plaintiffs Motion to Remand without prejudice. The Court would continue Defendants Motion to Dismiss until July 6, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. to allow both sides to brief the motion in accordance with the applicable local rules. Plaintiff moved ex parte on June 8, 2017 for an order granting her procedural objection to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or an order continuing the June 12, 2017 hearing on Defendants' motion. In light of the above ruling said application is moot. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
