Zhang Xudong v. John Bradford Flecke et al
Plaintiff: Zhang Xudong
Defendant: 1776 Wealth Architects, Barr Consulting And Holdings, Inc., Barr Holdings, LLC, DemarestBoston Legal, Does, John Bradford Flecke and Hung Ern Toh
Case Number: 2:2017cv02876
Filed: April 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 91 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Zhang Xudong and against Defendants Hung Ern Toh, Barr Holdings, LLC and Barr Consulting & Holdings, Inc., jointly and severally, as follows: Defend ants Hung Ern Toh, Barr Holdings, LLC and Barr Consulting andHoldings, Inc. are adjudged liable for fraud; and The Court awards to Plaintiff Zhang Xudong damages in the amount of $261,072.90, which consists of $259,780.00 in compensatory damages and costs in the amount of $1292.90, as well as post-judgment interest from the date of entry ofthe Judgment until paid.. Related to: Order on Mot on for Default Judgment,, 90 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 22 . The Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's first, second, third, fourth, and sixth claims with respect to Toh and Flecke. The Cou rt DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's first, second, third, and sixth claims as against Barr Consulting and Holdings, Inc., Demarest, and Architects. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's second claim against Barr Holdings, LLC. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's fourth claim as against Demarest and Architects. The Court DENIES defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's fourth claim as against the Barr Entities. The Court DENIES defendants& #039; motion to dismiss plaintiff's first, third, and sixth claims as against Barr Holdings, LLC. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff's fifth claim against Flecke. Plaintiff is hereby granted 28 days leave to file an amended com plaint curing the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to amend within 28 days of the date of this order may result in dismissal with prejudice. The Court further sets a Telephonic Status Conference for 10/2/2017 12:00 PM before Judge Christina A. Snyder, to discuss status of the case. Counsel for PLAINTIFF is ordered to initiate the telephone conference call THROUGH THE TELEPHONE OPERATOR to include all counsel of record, and CHAMBERS on the date and time scheduled. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zhang Xudong v. John Bradford Flecke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1776 Wealth Architects
Represented By: Pamela Tahim Thakur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barr Consulting And Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Pamela Tahim Thakur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barr Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Pamela Tahim Thakur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DemarestBoston Legal
Represented By: Pamela Tahim Thakur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Bradford Flecke
Represented By: Pamela Tahim Thakur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hung Ern Toh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zhang Xudong
Represented By: Rachel Tessa Gezerseh
Represented By: Jason L Liang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?