Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. BGSD, Inc et al
| Deckers Outdoor Corporation |
| BGSD, Inc, Does and Momo Baby, Inc |
| 2:2017cv02901 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Steve Kim |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Defendants BGSD, Inc. dba Luxury Lane and Momo Baby, Inc. agreed to the terms of a permanent injunction. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees associated with this action. Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved and dismissed with prejudice. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled 15 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed withoutcosts and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 DAYS,to reopenthe action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdictionover this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The Stipulation and Request to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint 16 ishereby DENIED as MOOT. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
