Marie Hernandez v. Starbucks Corporation et al
| Marie Hernandez |
| Does, Starbucks Corporation and Teavana Corporation |
| 2:2017cv03150 |
| April 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John F. Walter |
| Labor: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Marie Hernandez's Renewed Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 USC 1447 34 by Judge John F. Walter: In light of the evidence presented by Plaintiff which reduces Defendant's estimated amount in controversy below $5,000,000, the Court concludes that remand is warranted. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Remand is GRANTED. This action is hereby remanded to Ventura County Superior Court. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF MARIE document 17 and ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILESURREPLY IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND Docket No. 27 by Judge John F. Walter: Before Plaintiff files a renewed Motion to Remand, the parties shall meet and confer in person on or before June 12, 2017. See order for details. (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
