Jose A Miranda v. SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc. et al
Jose A Miranda |
Aurora Loan Services LLC, Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, DOES 1-10, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Quality Loan Service Corporation, SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
2:2017cv03153 |
April 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A. Kronstadt |
Karen L. Stevenson |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DKT. 11 ); PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT (DKT. 22 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Motion to Remand is DENIED and the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than August 7, 2017. (ah) |
Filing 45 MINUTES OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DKT. 11 ); PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT (DKT. 22 ); ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO DEFENDANTS SCME MORTGAGE BANKERS, INC., QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION AND AZEC FORECLOSURE CORPORATION (DKT. 37 ); SCHEDULING CONFERENCEheld before Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court takes the Motions UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Last day to file Motions (including discovery motions) February 5,2018. See Minute Order for Specifics. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (ah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.