Rhonda Maye Wisto v. Derral Adams
Petitioner: Rhonda Maye Wisto
Respondent: Derral Adams
Case Number: 2:2017cv03216
Filed: April 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F. MacKinnon
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, in favor of Derral Adams against Rhonda Maye Wisto. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 21 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhonda Maye Wisto v. Derral Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Derral Adams
Represented By: Ana R Duarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rhonda Maye Wisto
Represented By: Jonathan Paul Milberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?