A-Fordable Billing Solution, Inc. v. Artemis Hill Recovery, Inc. et al
| A-Fordable Billing Solution, Inc. |
| Artemis Hill Recovery, Inc. and Does |
| A-Fordable Billing Solution, Inc., Moes and United States of America |
| Artemis Hill Recovery, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv03319 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| John F. Walter |
| Taxes |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER Re Stipulation of Dismissal 31 by Judge John F. Walter as follows: (1) The Court hereby dismisses the above-entitled action in its entirety, with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VA CATED. (2) The surrender of $25,084.38 by Artemis to the IRS is in compliance with Title 26 United States Code section 6332(a) and discharges Artemis of any obligation or liability to USA and ABS with respect to the $25,084.38 at issue in the Complaint and the instant Cross-Complaint in Interpleader, and resolves all remaining issues in the instant Cross-Complaint in Interpleader. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John F. Walter. Based on the Joint Report filed May 30, 2017, it appears that counsel for Plaintiff failed to participate in the Rule 26(f) conference. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing by June 2, 2017 why the Plaintiff's counsel should not be sanctioned in the amount of $1,500.00 and why this action should not be dismissed. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions and the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
