Ron Sarfaty et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Ron Sarfaty and Gary Scherer |
| City of Los Angeles and Does |
| 2:2017cv03594 |
| October 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of Defendant City of Los Angeles and against plaintiffs Gary Scherer, Ron Sarfaty Related to: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Entry of Judgment 21 . (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court, on August 28, 2017, issued an order granting the motion to dismiss in its entirety. On September 27, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Co urt of Appeals. Accordingly, the Court orders that this matter be stayed and moved to the inactive calendar pending the appeal. The parties shall notify the Court, in writing, when the stay should be lifted and request that the matter be restored to the active calendar. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
