Webspectator Corporation v. Andre Tomas Da Silva Pereir Nascimento Parreira
Webspectator Corporation |
DOES, Rafael Mora Funes, Andre Tomas Da Silva Pereir Nascimento Parreira, Dulce Catarina Parreira and Webspectator, LDA |
2:2017cv03921 |
June 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Percy Anderson |
John E. McDermott |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson re: APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction Reply 28 . For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff mu st have access to its accounts and computer systems, including those maintained on servers operated by Amazon Web Services, during the pendency of this action. The Court therefore will continue the terms of the TRO during the pendency of this acti on. Defendants Andr Tomas Da Silva Pereira Nascimento Parreira, Dulce Catarina Pareira, Rafael Mora Funes ("Mora"), and Webspectator Lda, along with their officers, agents, servants, employees, and other persons who are in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order are enjoined: (see document for details). This preliminary injunction is contingent upon Plaintiff maintaining the $100,000.00 in security it posted upon the issuance of the TRO. (mrgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.