Iconic Images, LTD v. The Beverly Hills Hotel Corporation et al
| Iconic Images, LTD |
| Does, Sajahtera, Inc. and The Beverly Hills Hotel Corporation |
| 2:2017cv04253 |
| June 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 2, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Percy Anderson: In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before August 31, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
