Microsoft Corporation v. Fame 1 Computers, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation |
Fame 1 Computers, Inc. |
2:2017cv04464 |
June 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Fame 1 and CorpITGroup and their directors, principals, officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns are enjoined and restrained from: Copying or making an y other infringing use or infringing distribution of Microsofts software and other intellectual property, including product activation keys decoupled from their original licensed software; Assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities listed above. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 18 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 3, 2017, why this action should not be dismiss ed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. Fame 1 Computers, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fame 1 Computers, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation | |
Represented By: | Anna R Buono |
Represented By: | Brooke E Howlett |
Represented By: | Bonnie Elizabeth MacNaughton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.