Veil V. Douglass v.Michael Lin et al
Plaintiff: Veil V. Douglass
Defendant: Alasyyid, Jaspal Dhaiwal and Michael Lin
Case Number: 2:2017cv05020
Filed: July 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 93 JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb. Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the entire action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 92 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Current Address by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Plaintiff is order to provide a current to the Court within (14) days of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (See order for further details) (et)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John W. Holcomb for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 76 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' unopposed Motion to Dismiss is granted. The only remaining claim is Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for medical indifference against Dr. Lin. (et)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 49 (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Response to Order to Show Cause due within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. (See document for details.) (sbou)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The Court thus authorizes Plaintiff to submit two written questions or interrogatories to the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") to determine the last known addresses fo r service of process of Lin and of Alsayyid. Plaintiff=s discovery shall be served within thirty (30) days of the date of this order and shall be served pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 31, the text of which is set forth at the end of this Order. (See document for further details.) (sbou)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Plaintiff's deadline to file his Notice of Submission has expired. Plaintiff has neither filed his Notice of Submission nor sought an extension of time in which to do so. This represents a failure to prosecute. Accordingly, on or before April 28, 2018, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why Plaintiff did not timely file his Notice of Submission, and why the Cour t should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's prior order; or (b) serve and file his Notice of Submission in the format specified in the Court's November 30, 2017 order. Plaintiff is expr essly forewarned that if he fails to do either, the Court will deem such failure a further violation of a Court order justifying a recommendation of dismissal and also deem such failure as further evidence of a lack of prosecution warranting a recommendation of dismissal. (see document for details). (dro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Veil V. Douglass v.Michael Lin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alasyyid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jaspal Dhaiwal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Lin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Veil V. Douglass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?