Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, et al
| Arrow Electronics, Inc. |
| Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company |
| Arrow Electronics, Inc. |
| Travelers Casualty and Surety Company |
| 2:2017cv05247 |
| July 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| John F. Walter |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
283
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Arrow and against Defendant Liberty Mutual as set forth above. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment as set forth above and to close this case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
|
Filing
142
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and defendant and counterclaimant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, f/k/a The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (erroneously su ed as Aetna Casualty & Surety Company n/k/a Travelers Casualty & Surety Company a/k/a St. Paul Travelers)) and against plaintiff and counter-defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc. on its first amended complaint and this action shall be dismissed on its merits. Liberty Mutual and Travelers shall recover their costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
