Deborah M Manchester v. Sivantos GMBH et al
Deborah M Manchester, Ph.D. |
Does, Sivantos GMBH and Sivantos, Inc. |
2:2017cv05309 |
July 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Otis D. Wright |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 661 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants on all Manchesters pleaded claims.Manchester shall take nothing by way of her Second Amended Complaint.by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, in favor of Auralcare Hearing Centers of America, Sivantos GMBH, Sivantos, Inc., David D Larsen against Deborah M Manchester, Ph.D. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) |
Filing 652 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE COUNTER COMPLAINT 118 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the foregoing reasons, Manchester's Motion to Strike is GRANTED. (lom) |
Filing 647 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 438 ,granting 446 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Sivantos and AuralCares Motions for SummaryJudgment are GRANTED. The parties shall submit proposed Judgment within one week of the issuance of this order. (lc) |
Filing 262 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS, HIGHLY SENSITIVE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND/OR TRADE SECRETS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (See document for details.) (sbou) |
Filing 54 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. 49 (sbou) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS 17 , 19 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS, in part, Sivantos, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss, with leave to amend, and GRANTS Sivantos GMBHs Motion, as described abo ve. To the extent Manchester wishes to amend her Complaint, she must do so within 60 days of the date of this Order, in conjunction with her declaration regarding service of Sivantos GMBH. Manchester also must submit a redlined copy of her amended Complaint. (lc). Modified on 1/29/2018 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.