AMCO Insurance Company et al v. Rhyna Rivas et al
| AMCO Insurance Company, Beverly Alvarado Medical Building and The Beaumont Company |
| Does, Abassian Marrache, Medicare, Rhyna Rivas and United States of America |
| 2:2017cv05414 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND "MEDICARE," AND REMANDING ACTION TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 9/12/2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Ca use ("OSC") by 9/26/2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant United States, and reminded Plaintiffs of their obligation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) to serve all defendants within 90 days of the filing of t he Complaint 9 . To date, Plaintiffs have not responded to the OSC. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' action against Defendants United States and "Medicare" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for lack of prosecution. Further, since the only federal governmental defendants in this action have been dismissed, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the case. Therefore, this action is hereby REMANDED to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number 17K06211. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before September 26, 2017 why this action should not be dismisse d as to defendant United States of America for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant United States of America if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
