Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr. v. R.J. Rackley

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr. v. R.J. Rackley

Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr. v. R.J. Rackley

Petitioner:	Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr
Respondent:	R. J. Rackley
Case Number:	2:2017cv05488
Filed:	July 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 2, 2019	Filing 15 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 14 . Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner Kenneth L. Finnell, Junior. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
August 25, 2017	Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Under the allegations and facts of the petition, petitioner has not demonstrated that he is entitled to a later start date of the limitati ons period. Therefore, and because the petition does not demonstrate any basis for tolling the statute, or for setting aside the one-year limitation, the Court orders petitioner to show cause in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of this ord er why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. If petitioner fails to provide a timely response to this order, the Court will recommend that the petition be dismissed, with prejudice, as time-barred. (see document for further details) (klg)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 2, 2019

Filing 15 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 14 . Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner Kenneth L. Finnell, Junior. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

August 25, 2017

Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Under the allegations and facts of the petition, petitioner has not demonstrated that he is entitled to a later start date of the limitati ons period. Therefore, and because the petition does not demonstrate any basis for tolling the statute, or for setting aside the one-year limitation, the Court orders petitioner to show cause in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of this ord er why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. If petitioner fails to provide a timely response to this order, the Court will recommend that the petition be dismissed, with prejudice, as time-barred. (see document for further details) (klg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr. v. R.J. Rackley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth L. Finnell, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: R. J. Rackley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?