Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joey Stanton Dodson

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joey Stanton Dodson

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joey Stanton Dodson

Plaintiff:	Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:	Joey Stanton Dodson
Case Number:	2:2017cv05520
Filed:	July 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge:	Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 27, 2017	Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEY STANTON DODSON by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $1,718,026, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $189,389, and a civil penalty in t he amount of $859,013 pursuant to Section 20(d)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 21(d)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $2,766,428 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 27, 2017

Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEY STANTON DODSON by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $1,718,026, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $189,389, and a civil penalty in t he amount of $859,013 pursuant to Section 20(d)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 21(d)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $2,766,428 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joey Stanton Dodson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joey Stanton Dodson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By:	Terry R Miller
Represented By:	Donald W Searles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?