Ulises Carbajal Velasco v. W. L. Montgomery
Petitioner: Ulises Carbajal Velasco
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Case Number: 2:2017cv05793
Filed: August 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr., Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied on the merits and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ulises Carbajal Velasco v. W. L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Represented By: Ana R Duarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ulises Carbajal Velasco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?