CamCal Enterprises, LLC v. ZuFlux, LLC
| CamCal Enterprises, LLC |
| ZuFlux, LLC |
| 2:2017cv05799 |
| August 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Steve Kim |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiff CamCal Enterprises, LLC dba BottleKeeper's Application for Entry of a Default Judgment by this Court Against Defendant ZuFlux, LLC dba Vape Armor! ("ZuFlux") 37 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that it has been found that United States Patent No. 9,505,527 and United States Patent No. 9,637,270 have been infringed by ZuFlux's manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale, and/or sale of the ZuFlux bottle enclosure in/into the United States. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 6, 2018, why this action should not be dism issed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
12
Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before December 13,2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CamCal Enterprises, LLC v. ZuFlux, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CamCal Enterprises, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Charles August Kertell |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Robert LaPorte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ZuFlux, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
