Sharon Spencer v. Sargeant James Gaffney et al
Sharon R Spencer |
Sargeant James Gaffney and Officer Tomas Rodda |
2:2017cv05810 |
August 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
S. James Otero |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. IT IS ORDERED that this entire action be, and hereby is, dismissed with PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (See document for further details.) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sbou) |
Filing 26 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than April 23, 2018. Filing of a motion to amend and lodgin g of a proposed amended complaint consistent with the requirements of the January 17, 2018 Order shall be a satisfactory response to this Order to Show Cause. No extensions of this deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (See document for further details.) (sbou) |
Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT AND FILE PROOF OF SERVICE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/21/2017. [See Order to Show Cause for details.] (san) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.