Tinamarie Fatiah Al-Najjar v. Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. et al
| Tinamarie Fatiah Al-Najjar |
| Does and Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv06166 |
| August 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT 10 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Before the Court is a motion for order remanding case to state court filed by Plaintiff Tinamarie Fatiah Al-Najjar (Plaintiff). See Dkt. # 10 (Mot.). Defendant Kindred HealthcareOperating, Inc. (Defendant) opposes the motion, see Dkt. # 16 (Opp.), and Plaintiff timely filed a reply, see Dkt. # 17 (Reply). The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision witho ut oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. Having considered the moving papers, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Because the Court concludes that Defendant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the $5 million CAFA amount in controversy requirement is met here, and thus that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, it DENIES Plaintiffs motion for order remanding case to state court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ab)
|
|
Filing
15
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 14 (see attached) (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
