Maureen DCamp v. DFS Group, L.P., et al
Maureen DCamp |
Does 1 through 100, inclusive and DFS Group, L.P. |
2:2017cv06473 |
September 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Karen L Stevenson |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action with Prejudice #20 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's Complaint and this entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (2) Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the prosecution and defense of this action. (iv) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Defendant's notice of settlement, filed February 14, 2018, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By April 2, 2018 the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of April 3, 2018. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (kti) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement [L.R. 16-15.7] filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 17 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/7/2018. Joint status report re settlement due by 8/14/2018; no appearance necessary. (gk) |
Filing 16 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court has scheduled the dates set forth on the last page of this Order after review of the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Therefore, the Court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Jury Trial set for 10/2/2018 08:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/4/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Amended Pleadings and Addition of Parties Cut-Off 2/16/2018. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 5/29/2018. Motions due by 6/8/2018. Settlement Conference Completion Date 8/7/2018. Motions in Limine to be filed by 8/14/2018. Joint Status Report re Settlement due by 8/14/2018. Proposed Pretrial Conference Order due by 8/14/2018. Joint Exhibit List due by 8/14/2018. Witness List due by 8/14/2018. See document for further details. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates) (gk) |
Filing 15 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. as to Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #14 . (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 to 7 days, filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P... (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2017 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (clee) |
Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (clee) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Notice of Reassignment to District Judge and Referral Magistrate Judge filed on September 29, 2017. Please substitute the initials DMG in place of the current initials, so that the case number will now read CV 17-6473-DMG (JPRx). As documents are routed using the judge's initials, it is imperative that the correct initials DMG be used on all subsequent filings to prevent any delays in the processing of documents. Judge Gee's Courtroom Deputy Clerk is Kane Tien. He can be reached at (213) 894-5452. Judge Gee's courtroom is located on the 8th floor of the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom #8C. Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourt.gov. (clee) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:17-cv-06473 DMG(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 9 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. The Defendant does not consent. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on September 1, 2017. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (rh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (esa) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P. identifying LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc.; Chamarac Properties, Inc.; DFS Group Limited; DFS Merchandising Limited as Corporate Parent. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P., identifying Plaintiff Maureen D'Camp, Defendant DFS Group L.P., Beazley Group, DFS Group Limited, LVMH Moet Hennessey Louis Vuitton Inc., Chamarac Properties, Inc., DFS Merchandising Limited, Littler Mendelson, P.C. - Counsel for Defendant, Desjardins & Pantz, LLP - Counsel for Plaintiff. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. (Mittal, Jyoti) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Torrance Superior Court, case number YC072129 Receipt No: 0973-20444567 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant DFS Group, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jyoti Mittal, #2 Exhibit A to Mittal Decl/Complaint, #3 Exhibit B to Mittal Decl/Summons, #4 Exhibit C to Mittal Decl/Notice of Service of Process, #5 Exhibit D to Mittal Decl/Answer, #6 Exhibit E to Mittal Decl/Misc, #7 Declaration of Lyndal Larkin, #8 Exhibit F to Larkin Declaration, #9 Declaration of David Suzuki) (Attorney Jyoti Mittal added to party DFS Group, L.P.(pty:dft))(Mittal, Jyoti) |
COPY OF NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS executed by Plaintiff Maureen DCamp, upon Defendant DFS Group, L.P. served on 8/4/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC, Agent of Service of Process, on a domestic corporation. Original Summons NOT returned. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant DFS Group, L.P.(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants DFS Group, L.P., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Maureen DCamp. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.