Aftomedia, Inc. v. Ad.Com Interative Media, Inc., et al
| Aftomedia, Inc. |
| Ad.Com Interactive Media, Inc., Admedia, Inc. and Does |
| 2:2017cv06548 |
| September 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:Plaintiff AFTOMEDIA, INC's shall recover from defendant AD.COM INTERACTIVE MEDIA, INC. d/b/a ADMEDIA, INC. the judgment as follows: (a) Damages in the amount of $23,774.13; (b) Attorney's Fees, in the amount $14,875.00; (c) Prejudgment Interest, in the amount of $2,377; (d) Costs and Expenses, in the amount of $891.00; for TOTAL $41,917.13. (gk)
|
|
Filing
16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than November 21, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Ad.Com Interactive Media, Inc. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
