Abacuc Heras v. Bed Bath and Beyond of California, Limited Liability Company , et al
Abacuc Heras |
Bed Bath and Beyond of California, Limited Liability Company, Bristol Group, Inc, Does, Northern RHP, LLC, Rolling Hills Plaza Shopping Center, Rolling Hills Plaza Venture 96, LLC and Rolling Hills Plaza, LLC |
2:2017cv06593 |
September 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W. Fitzgerald |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: A Show Cause re Dismissal Hearing is set for 12/18/2017 at 11:30 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance is needed. All other dates are hereby vacated. (cw) |
Filing 19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than November 20, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: Proof of service of ADA Disability Access Litigation/Application for Stay and Early Mediation Packet. Answers by the defendants or applications for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). (rfi) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.