Waldo Leyva v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| Waldo Felix Leyva |
| Nissan North America, Inc., a California corporation and Nissa North America, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv06682 |
| September 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:17-cv-01870 FMO (SHKx). (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Plainitff's Local Civil Rule 7.1-1 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Waldo Felix Leyva, (Lurie, Jordan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Waldo Felix Leyva. (Lurie, Jordan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Waldo Felix Leyva. (Lurie, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20486844 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Waldo Felix Leyva. (Attorney Jordan L Lurie added to party Waldo Felix Leyva(pty:pla))(Lurie, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
