Audi AG et al v. Onunwa Kelechi Iwuagwu et al
| Audi AG, Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. |
| Audibadges.com, Auto Accessories, Autobadges.com, Chromecarletters.com, Eurobadgez.com, Onunwa Kelechi Iwuagwu, Okixtreme, Okixtreme.com and Zzpdecals.com |
| 2:2017cv06706 |
| September 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Defendants and their owners, shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, successors, and all persons acting in concert or in participation with any of them a re hereby permanently enjoined from: imitating, copying, or making unauthorized use of any of the Audi and/or VW Marks, counterfeits thereof, or any confusingly similar variations thereof; Defendants are further ordered to deliver to Audi and VW and their counsel for destruction all products, labels, tags, signs, prints, packages, videos, and advertisements in their possession or under their control, bearing or using any or all of the Audi and/or VW Marks or any confusingly similar variation the reof, and all plates, molds, matrices and other means of making the same. Audi and VW, on the one hand, and Defendants, on the other hand, have entered into a Settlement Agreement for the resolution of the claims asserted in this matter. The Court re tains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of said Settlement Agreement. Audi and VW, on the one hand, and Defendants, on the other hand, have entered into a Settlement Agreement for the resolution of the claims asserted in this matter. The Court retain s jurisdiction to enforce the terms of said Settlement Agreement. Based upon the parties Stipulation and Settlement, all claims asserted by Audi and VW against Defendants in this action are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. However, the Court retains and shall have continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction as well as theSettlement Agreement described above, but the clerk will close the case. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction 11 , filed September 14, 2017, is VACATED as MOOT. See order for further details. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
