Lacy Atzin et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
| Mark Andersen and Lacy Atzin |
| Anthem UM Services, Inc. and Anthem, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv06816 |
| September 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : The Court GRANTS final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 of the settlement of the individual claims of Plaintiffs Lacy Atzin and Mark Andersen and the class claims of the Knee Subclass and the Foot/Ankle Subclass as against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Service, Inc. 13 , and accordingly DISMISSES this entire action and all individual and class claims therein on the merits and with prejudice. This order constitutes the FINAL JUDGMENT of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTIONSETTLEMENT 113 AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES 111 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Court APPROVES the settlement. First, the Court CONDITIONALLY GRANTS the Motion fo r Final Approval and approves of the key relief, an injunction directing Anthem to reprocess the claims of the class under the new agreed-upon medical necessity criteria, with the grant conditioned on the parties providing one more round of post-appr oval notice to the class as detailed below. (ECF No. 113.) The Court makes the following findings in connection with settlement approval: (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS RE FINDINGS). Within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order, the parties sh all file a declaration confirming that the class has been provided with post-approval notice as discussed herein and at the final approval hearing. Moreover, by the same date, the parties shall file a Proposed Judgment that omits detailed findings. S ee Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(a), 58(a). Upon receipt of these documents, the final approval motion shall, with no further notice or order from the Court, be deemed fully granted as provided herein, and the Court will issue a judgment of dismissal. Moreover, The Court substantially GRANTS the Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards. (ECF No. 111.) Specifically, the Court AWARDS: attorneys fees in the amount of $850,00.00; costs in the amount of $36,833.99; and incentive payments in the amount of $10,000.00 for each of the two named Plaintiffs. (lc)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. The Court appoints Plaintiff Mark Andersen as Class Representative, and Gianelli & Morris and Doyle Law, APC as Class Counsel 55 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 5/6/2020 (lc).
|
|
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: re Stipulation for Protective Order 49 . (sbou)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 20 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
