Robert Sanchez v. Long Beach Muffler et al
| Robert Sanchez |
| Curtis P. Grieder, Long Beach Muffler and Dennis Brian Schoedl |
| 2:2017cv06824 |
| September 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, 33 . In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 33 ), the Court hereby DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Court VACATES all other dates and deadlines in this action, and the Clerk of Court shall close the case. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF COOPERATION IN DRAFTING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Plaintiff Robert Sanchez is hereby ORDERED TO SHOWCAUSE, in writing only, no later than January 8, 2018, why he did not confer with Defendant o r assist in the preparation of the 26(f) Report in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Courts Order. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice for failure to prosecute. The Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED until February 5, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
