Arcona, Inc. v. Farmacy Beauty, LLC, et al
| Arcona, Inc. |
| David C. Chung, Farmacy Beauty, LLC and Mark Veeder |
| 2:2017cv07058 |
| September 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 153 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court awards Farmacy attorneys' fees in the amount of $504,382.43 and costs in the amount of $602.90, for a total award of $504,985.33. (lc)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND NON-TAXABLE COSTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 142 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Given the nature of Plaintiffs appeal, and upon consideration of Defendants Motion for Attorney Fees and Non-Taxable Costs, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants Motion. If appropriate, Defendants may renew their motion within 30 days of the entry of the Ninth Circuits Mandate on the pending appeal. (lc)
|
|
Filing
138
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, ANDDECREED that: 1. Pursuant to the Courts Order Granting Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 129), and Order on Plaintiffs Request(ECF No. 136), judgment is e ntered in favor of Defendants and againstPlaintiff on Plaintiffs First Cause of Action for Trademark Counterfeiting of Arconas 079 Trademark Registration pursuant to the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984. 2. Plaintiffs Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth causes of action for trademark infringement of Arconas 079 Trademark Registration and unfair competition (Federal and State Law), respectively, all of which are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Pursuant to the Courts Order on Plaintiffs Req uest (ECF No. 136), Defendants counterclaims for non-infringement and cancellation of Arconas 079 Trademark Registration are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. All other dates and deadlines in this case are hereby VACATED; and 5. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vv)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 49 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs claim for counterfeiting. (lc)
|
|
Filing
39
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 38 . (mz)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING, IN PART, AND GRANTING, IN PART, INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS MOTION TODISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 20 . To the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend the Complaint, Plaintiff must do so before April 11, 2018. Plaintiff must also lodge a redlined copy of any amended complaint for the Court and Defendants review by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
