Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anand Jayapalan et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Ananda Kumar Ananda, Vijaya Ananda, Anand Jayapalan and Rajni Nair |
2:2017cv07186 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Michael R. Wilner |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT RAJNI NAIR by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $1,425.05, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Com plaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $14.25, and a civil penalty in the amount of $1,425.05 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $2,864.35 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. See document for details. (lom) Modified on 2/27/2018 (lom). |
Filing 33 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ANAND JAYAPALAN by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $173,208.85 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $173,208.85 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.