Willis Gurevich v. BMW of North America, LLC
Willis Gurevich |
BMW of North America, LLC |
2:2017cv07210 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Steve Kim |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: denying 9 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Willis Gurevich v. BMW of North America, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC | |
Represented By: | Bowman and Brooke LLP |
Represented By: | Jennifer Neiman Hinds |
Represented By: | Richard L Stuhlbarg |
Represented By: | Brian Takahashi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Willis Gurevich | |
Represented By: | Vladimir Galstyan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.