Alvin Alvarez v. Office Depot, Inc et al
| Alvin Alvarez |
| Does and Office Depot, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv07220 |
| September 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 11 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Before the Court is a motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed byPlaintiff Alvin Alv arez (Plaintiff). See Dkt. # 11 (Mot.). Defendant Office Depot, Inc. (Defendant) opposes the motion, see Dkt. # 12 (Opp.), and Plaintiff timely replied, see Dkt.# 13 (Reply). The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. Having considered the moving papers, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Because the Court concludes that Defendant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the $5 million CAFA amount in controversy requirement is satisfied, and thus that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, it DENIES Plaintiffs motion toremand. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
