Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Prestige Entertainment Inc. et al
Ticketmaster L.L.C. |
Does, Steven K. Lichtman, Nicholas Lombardi, Prestige Entertainment West, Inc., Prestige Entertainment. Inc. and Renaissance Ventures LLC |
2:2017cv07232 |
October 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Otis D. Wright |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION PER STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT against defendants Steven K. Lichtman, Nicholas Lombardi, Prestige Entertainment West, Inc., Renaissance Ventures LLC. Except as adjudicated herein, all claims asserted by Ticketmaster against Defendants as well as all counterclaims asserted by Defendants against Ticketmaster shall hereby be dismissed with prejudice by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc) |
Filing 82 ORDER RE: PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO FASTSOFTWARE SOLUTIONS,LLC ONLY 81 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) Modified on 11/6/2018 .(lc). |
Filing 48 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDEDCOMPLAINT 37 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 46 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. 45 (sbou) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 24 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Dismissal is with leave to amend, except as to Ticketmasters second claim for copyright infringement to the extent it relies on Defendants TOU violations described in this Order. Should Ticketmaster wish to file an amended complaint, it must do so within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. Ticketmaster must also lodge with the Court, and serve on Defendants, a redlined copy of the amended pleading so that the Court can decipher the amendments to its complaint. (lc). Modified on 1/31/2018 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.