Kate Scott et al v. City Council for the City of Santa Monica et al
James Babinski and Kate Scott |
City Council for the City of Santa Monica and Does |
Joanna L Simon |
National Business Aviation Association and Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association and Santa Monica Airport Association |
Santa Monica Airport Association |
2:2017cv07329 |
October 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Frederick F. Mumm |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 Order re: Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction 6 ; Request for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Reconsideration 45 ; Ex Parte Applications to File Amicus Briefs 47 , 48 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Plaintiffs' Application 6 re preliminary injunction is DENIED, and the TRO is dissolved. Additionally, Plaintiffs' Request for Reconsideration 45 is DENIED. NBAA & AOPA's Application 48 is GRANTED in its entirety, and SMAA's Application 47 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, such that the Court considers the arguments within the Applications but does not delay ruling until SMAA files additional briefing. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Plaintiff's Application for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED 6 . Please refer to the Order for complete details. (kd). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.