Emily Hernandez v. Elaine C. Duke
Plaintiff: Emily Hernandez
Defendant: Elaine C. Duke
Case Number: 2:2017cv07375
Filed: October 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 60 JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT(S) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff(s): Emily Hernandez take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and that the defendant(s): Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emily Hernandez v. Elaine C. Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elaine C. Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Hernandez
Represented By: Edward J Blum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?