Sheliema Lewis v. City of Culver City et al
Sheliema Lewis |
Sgt John Benjamin, City of Culver City, Culver City Police Department, Does, Officer Jonathon Flores, Detective John Purnell and Detective M. Van Hook |
2:2017cv07635 |
October 18, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Otis D. Wright |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim. On March 19, 2018, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Complaint, with leave to amend. ) The Court ordered that Plaintiff must amend her complaint within twenty-one days of the date of the Order. That deadline has passed, and Plaintiff never filed an amended complaint. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES this action.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 20 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss, with leave to amend. Should Plaintiff wish to file an amended complaint, she must do so within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. She must also lodge with the Court, and serve on the Defendants, a redlined copy of the amended pleading so that the Court can decipher the amendments to her complaint. (lc). Modified on 3/20/2018 .(lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.