Universal Dyeing and Printing Inc v. Liberty Apparel Company Inc et al
| Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. |
| Does, Eric Jay Ltd, Fullbeauty Brands Inc and Liberty Apparel Company Inc |
| 2:2017cv07854 |
| October 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 38 . THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and 2. Plaintiff and Defendants will each bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
26
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Judge Percy Anderson. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Percy Anderson: In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before February 9, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
