Idris Perkins v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Idris Perkins
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv08227
Filed: November 11, 2017
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 16, 2018 15 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero. Having approved the parties' joint stipulation to voluntary remand 13 pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g) and to entry of judgment, THE COURT ADJUDGES AND DECREES that judgment is entered for Plaintiff. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Idris Perkins v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Timothy R Bolin
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Idris Perkins
Represented By: Andrew Thomas Koenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?