Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., et al
| IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation and Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. |
| SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOE, Does 1-10, inclusive and Salesforce.com, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv08277 |
| November 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) |
Filing 27
STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL; ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) filed by defendant Salesforce.com, Inc..(Slafsky, John) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Settlement filed by defendant Salesforce.com, Inc.. (Slafsky, John) |
|
Filing 24
PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Notice of Lodging #23 . (see order for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #19 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stipulated Protective Order)(Bringuel, Kevin) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than December 14, 2018. (cw)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/19 at 2:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 2/5/19 at 9:00 AM. (cw)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference presently set for 5/7/18 is VACATED, and the following dates are hereby set. Opening Expert Witness Disclosure: 11/6/18, Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure: 12/4/18, Expert Discovery Cut-off: 12/21/18, Amended Pleadings due: 6/7/18, Discovery cut-off: 10/30/18, Motions due: 11/13/18, Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/19 at 2:30 PM; and Jury Trial set for 2/5/19 at 9:00 AM. Please review the Court's trial order for further details. (cw)
|
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report ; estimated length of trial 7, filed by Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc... (Slafsky, John) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Ironhawk Technologies, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:18-CV-01481-DDP (Chennakesavan, Prashanth) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2018 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc., identifying salesforce.com, inc.. (Slafsky, John) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc..(Slafsky, John) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Salesforce.com, Inc. answer now due 1/7/2018, filed by Plaintiff Salesforce.com, Inc..(Attorney John Lawrence Slafsky added to party Salesforce.com, Inc.(pty:dft))(Slafsky, John) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ironhawk Technologies, Inc., upon Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc. served on 11/17/2017, answer due 12/8/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc. (bm) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ironhawk Technologies, Inc.. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (esa) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation identifying Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation, identifying Ironhawk Technologies, Inc.; Salesforce.com, Inc.. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation. (Liang, Enoch) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20822789 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation. (Attorney Enoch H Liang added to party IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation(pty:pla))(Liang, Enoch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
