Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maria Delordes Robles et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RIGHT, TITLE, LIEN OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFFS TITLE, Deutsche Mellon National Asset, LLC, Does, Maria Delordes Robles and West H and A LLC |
| 2:2017cv08428 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The August 2017 Fraudulent Assignment, recorded August 22, 2017 as instrument no. 20170952348, and the October 2017 Fraudulent Assignment, recorded October 23, 2017 as instrument no. 20171209297, are declared VOID ab initio and CANCELED. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (lc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 28 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Wells Fargos Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment. Therefore, the August 2017 Fraudulent Assignment, recorded August 22, 2017 as instrumen t no. 20170952348, and the October 2017 Fraudulent Assignment, recorded October 23, 2017 as instrument no. 20171209297, are declared VOID ab initio and CANCELED. (Id., Exs. 56.) Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk of the Court shall close the case.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
