Juan Mendoza v. Parker Hannifin Corporation et al
| Juan Mendoza |
| Does and Parker Hannifin Corporation |
| 2:2017cv08470 |
| November 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| John F. Walter |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DENYING Plaintiff Motion to Remand this Case to Los Angeles Superior Court 24 by Judge John F. Walter: For the reasons stated in Parker Hannifin Opposition, Plaintiff Motion to Remand this Case to Los Angeles Superior Court is DENIED. The Court adopts and signs, as modified, Parker Hannifin Proposed Statement of Decision Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, lodged with the Court on 1/10/2018 [Docket No. 31-1]. (jp)
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TAKING UNDER SUBMISSION Plaintiff Motion to Remand This Case to Los Angeles Superior Court 24 by Judge John F. Walter: Pursuant to Rule 78 of the FRCP and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriat e for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for 1/22/2018 is hereby vacated, and the matter is taken off calendar. The matter will be deemed submitted on the vacated hearing date, and the clerk will notify the parties when the Court has reached a decision. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
