Denise Thomas v. Ventura County Superior Court et al
| Ms. Denise Thomas |
| Amy Cannon, Does, Ms. Amy Smith, Amy Smith, Ventura County and Ventura County Superior Court |
| 2:2017cv08659 |
| November 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Petition of Denise Thomas for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Child by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause in writing no later than May 17, 2018 why Denise Thomas should be appoint ed as guardian ad litem for L.G.T., a minor child, in light of Denise Thomas' own interest in the litigation as a plaintiff on her own behalf and failure to submit a declaration stating that her appointment will not cause a conflict of interest. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING FAILURE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADING by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: The Court therefore ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 14 days of the date hereof, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/2/2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
