James Earl Nelson v. Robert Fox
James Earl Nelson |
Robert Fox |
2:2017cv08785 |
December 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
John F. Walter |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to the Order Denying Habeas Petition, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (clee) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: James Earl Nelson v. Robert Fox | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Robert Fox | |
Represented By: | E Carlos Dominguez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: James Earl Nelson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.