Cinthia Castillo v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
| Cinthia Castillo |
| AT&T Mobility Services LLC, DOES 1 through 25,, Does 1 to 100, inclusive and AT and T Mobility Services, LLC |
| 2:2017cv08986 |
| December 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl)
|
| Filing 25 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. No later than November 15, 2018, the parties shall email the Courtroom Clerk with a proposed order in connection with their Stipulation to Dismiss #24 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to the Matter being Resolved filed by PLAINTIFF Cinthia Castillo.(Hernandez, Stephanie) |
| Filing 23 Joint Response to Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Cinthia Castillo re: Order to Show Cause #22 (Hernandez, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/13/2018. (vdr)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE, REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF #20 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The new Initial Expert Witness Disclosure deadline is set for October 30, 2018. Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure deadline is set for November 27, 2018 and Expert Discovery Cut-Off is set for December 21, 2018. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date filed by PLAINTIFF Cinthia Castillo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re: Joint Stipulation for Continuance of Initial Expert Witness Disclosure, Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure, and Expert Discovery Cut-Off)(Hernandez, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION #18 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Continue Mediation Cut-Off and Discovery Cut-Off from August 27, 2018 to October 31, 2018 and September 26, 2018 filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Witt, Eric) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION #15 FOR CONTINUANCE OF FACT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE AND MEDIATION CUT-OFF DATE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The new discovery cut-off date and mediation cut-off date shall be August 27, 2018. (iv)
|
|
Filing 16
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Stipulation for Protective Order #11 . (ec)
|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Fact Discovery Cut-Off Date and Mediation Cut-Off Date from July 27, 2018 to August 27, 2018 filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Witt, Eric) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form,, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corrected Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order, #2 Proposed Order)(Kwun, Julie) |
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation for Protective Order #11 by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. The Stipulated Protective Order is accepted. However, counsel shall comply with L.R. 52-4.1 and attach a proposed Order to the Stipulation by filing a Notice of Lodging and attaching the proposed Stipulated Protective Order. Counsel shall further submit a redlined version of the proposed protective order for the Court's review. (ec)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Protective Order #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): The stipulation does not comply with: L.R. 52-4.1 Separate Order. A separate proposed order shall be submitted with any stipulation, application, motion, or request of the parties requiring an order of the court. If the proposed order is the result of a stipulation, the pertinent elements requested in the stipulation shall be set forth in the order. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ec) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC.(Witt, Eric) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Jury Trial set for 2/26/2019 at 8:45 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See order for dates, deadlines and requirements imposed.* (vdr)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 to 7 days, filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC.. (Kwun, Julie) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants AT and T Mobility Services, LLC, Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Cinthia Castillo. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/9/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT #1] (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/11/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT #1](et) |
| AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant AT and T Mobility Services, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/13/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT #2] (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC, identifying AT&T Inc. and Cricket Holdco Inc.. (Kwun, Julie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC. (Kwun, Julie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC682988 Receipt No: 0973-20971045 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal - Complaint and Other Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal - Amended Answer, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Declaration of Jackie A. Begue, #5 Declaration of Fred Schutz) (Attorney Julie Kwun added to party AT&T Mobility Services LLC(pty:dft))(Kwun, Julie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
