Shari Nazak-Dolan v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN
Defendant: SP Plus Corporation, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2017cv09027
Filed: December 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2018 Filing 47 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice Of Dismissal Pursuant To Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure 41(a) or (c))(Ferlauto, Thomas)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DKT. #34 , #36 ) AND MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. #35 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to the Local Rules and this Court's Standing Order, responses to SP Plus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #34 ) and Motion to Strike (Dkt. #35 ), and Andrews International, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #36 ), were to have been filed. The Court directs Plaintiff to file any oppositions to these motions no later than May 11, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Additionally, counsel for Plaintiff shall file a separate request by May 11, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. to file such oppositions, which shall explain the reason why they were not filed timely and why the Court should accept such late-filed submissions. The Court will determine whether the request will be granted at the hearing or in its ruling should it determine that a hearing is not necessary. If the oppositions and requests are not filed by May 11, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., the Court will deem the motions unopposed and the Court will make its determination upon the papers that have been submitted. If the oppositions and requests are filed by May 11, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., the replies shall be filed no later than May 21, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc5, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 7, 2018 Filing 45 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #34 #35 Notice of Non-Opposition filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Noon, Timothy)
May 7, 2018 Filing 44 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #34 Notice of Non-Opposition filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Noon, Timothy)
May 7, 2018 Filing 43 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Portions Of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #36 Notice Of Non-Receipt Of Plaintiff's Opposition To Motion filed by Defendant Andrews International. (Hunt, Kathleen)
April 30, 2018 Filing 42 AMENDED MINUTES held before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. See Minute Order for details. re: Telephone Conference #41 . (vm)
April 30, 2018 Filing 41 MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court conferred with the parties regarding status of the case. The Court sets a further telephonic status conference on June 29, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. A settlement conference is set for July 19, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Court Recorder: XTR 4/30/2018. (vm)
April 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. #36 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, continues the Motion from May 21, 2018 to June 25, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel shall refer to the Court's Standing Order with respect to the briefing schedule for motions. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 18, 2018 Filing 39 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Telephone Conference set for April 30, 2018 at 10:00 AM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court hereby orders that a protective order be put in place in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the stipulated protective order filed by the parties. re Stipulation for Protective Order #37 (vm)
April 17, 2018 Filing 37 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Order)(Noon, Timothy)
April 16, 2018 Filing 36 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Portions Of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by defendant Andrews International. Motion set for hearing on 5/21/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hunt, Kathleen)
April 16, 2018 Filing 35 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #34 filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 6/25/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #2 Declaration of George Gonzalez, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service) (Noon, Timothy)
April 16, 2018 Filing 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 6/25/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of George Gonzalez, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service) (Noon, Timothy)
April 16, 2018 Filing 33 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge John A. Kronstadt. The scheduling conference is held. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of the case. The Court has reviewed the parties' April 6, 2018 Joint Report and sets the following deadlines: Last day to amend or add parties 6/1/2018. Last day to participate in a settlement conference/mediation 7/31/18. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 10/30/2018. Last day to file All Motions 12/11/2018. Post Mediation Status Conference set for 8/27/2018 01:30 PM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (bp)
April 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for Settlement Conference. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than July 31, 2018. Status Conference set for August 27, 2018 at 1:30 pm before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ake)
April 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation. The time of the April 16, 2018 Scheduling Conference is advanced from 1:30 p.m. to 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10B. IT IS SO ORDERED (yl)
April 11, 2018 Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION to Continue SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from APRIL 16, 2018 to APRIL 23, 2018 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pessis, Surekha)
April 6, 2018 Filing 29 REPORT of Report of Parties' Planning Meeting filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Joint Report)(Cohen, Philip)
March 30, 2018 Filing 28 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #25 JURY DEMAND. filed by DEFENDANT City of Los Angeles.(Pessis, Surekha)
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, re Stipulation to Continue #26 . The Court DENIES the Stipulation without prejudice. To the extent Pessis learns that the trial will go forward, which would create a conflict with the hearing scheduled in this matter, counsel may renew its request by filing a stipulation and proposed order. (bp)
March 27, 2018 Filing 26 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from April 16, 2018 to May 14, 2018 filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Order)(Noon, Timothy)
March 26, 2018 Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan(Ferlauto, Thomas)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RE STIPULATION RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO by Judge John A. Kronstadt, #23 . The Stipulation is GRANTED. Plaintiff is permitted to file a First Amended Complaint on or before March 26, 2018. Defendants shall have until April 16, 2018 to file a response to the First Amended Complaint. (iv)
March 6, 2018 Filing 23 STIPULATION to FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ferlauto, Thomas)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Scheduling Conference set for 4/16/2018 at 01:30 PM. Joint Report due on 4/6/2018. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)
February 26, 2018 Filing 21 Defendant's Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation (Noon, Timothy)
February 26, 2018 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles, (Pessis, Surekha)
February 26, 2018 Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Attorney Surekha A Pessis added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Pessis, Surekha)
February 23, 2018 Filing 18 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Thomas M. Ferlauto on behalf of Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan. Filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan (Ferlauto, Thomas)
February 22, 2018 Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice of Association of Counsel #11 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Plaintiff shall either file the Court's Form G-123 or re-file the Notice with the signatures of both attorneys representing Plaintiff no later than February 26, 2018.. (bp)
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT SP PLUS CORPORATION MAY ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #10 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is GRANTED. Defendant SP Plus shall have up to and including March 9, 2018 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. (pso)
February 21, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Association of Counsel #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Notice of Association not signed by the firm of Phillip Cohen In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
February 21, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted as separate attachmet. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bp)
February 20, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Andrews International, identifying Shari Nazak-Dolan (Plaintiff); City of Los Angeles (Defendant); SP Plus Corporation (Defendant); Andrews International, Inc. (Defendant). (Hunt, Kathleen)
February 20, 2018 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Andrews International answer now due 3/12/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Andrews International.(Attorney Kathleen Anne Hunt added to party Andrews International(pty:dft))(Hunt, Kathleen)
February 20, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Thomas M. Ferlauto on behalf of Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan. Filed by Plaintiff Shari Nazak-Dolan (Attorney Thomas M Ferlauto added to party Shari Nazak-Dolan(pty:pla))(Ferlauto, Thomas)
February 16, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SP Plus Corporation answer now due 3/9/2018, filed by Defendant SP Plus Corporation.(Attorney Timothy S Noon added to party SP Plus Corporation(pty:dft))(Noon, Timothy)
December 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ah)
December 18, 2017 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Andrews International, City of Los Angeles, SP Plus Corporation. (et)
December 18, 2017 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 18, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et)
December 15, 2017 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN. (Cohen, Philip)
December 15, 2017 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN, identifying City of Los Angeles, SP Plus Corporation and Andrews International. (Cohen, Philip)
December 15, 2017 Filing 3 Demand for Jury filed by Plaintiff SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN (Cohen, Philip)
December 15, 2017 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN. (Cohen, Philip)
December 15, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20977235 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN. (Attorney Philip K Cohen added to party SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN(pty:pla))(Cohen, Philip)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shari Nazak-Dolan v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SP Plus Corporation
Represented By: Timothy S Noon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Cory M Brente
Represented By: Surekha A Shepherd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL
Represented By: Kathleen Anne Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHARI NAZAK-DOLAN
Represented By: Philip K Cohen
Represented By: Thomas M Ferlauto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?