Simon Levay et al v. AARP, Inc. et al
| Lionel Brown, Simon Levay and Judith Miller |
| AARP Services, Inc., AARP, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company |
| 2:2017cv09041 |
| December 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, 84 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (shb)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, GRANTING MOTION to Dismiss Case (First Amended Complaint) 39 , MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 40 , MOTION to Dismiss Case -- Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, with Proof of Service 41 . Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days after the date of this Order, or by November 16, 2018. (shb)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 39 , 40 41 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days after the date of this Order, or by July 26, 2018. (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
