Tortilla Factory, LLC v. Health Ade LLC et al
| Tortilla Factory, LLC |
| Does and Health Ade LLC |
| 2:2017cv09090 |
| December 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT HEALTH-ADE WITH PREJUDICE AND WAIVE COSTS 54 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Stipulation to Dismiss Defendant Health-Ade with Prejudice and Waive Costs is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than March 30, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecuti on. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: Proof of service of summons and complaint. Answer by the defendant or an application for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
